Upcoming Events

Editor’s Notebook

© by John Arkelian

The best of writing, photography, art, and argument – on everything from film to foreign policy.

“Ever dreamed of subscribing to a cultural magazine that doesn’t seem to be eating out of the hand of half a dozen media magnates? Something pluricultural and unassuming but nonetheless covering everything worth seeing, reading, doing or listening to for a season? Well, it exists, and in Canada to boot!”

“There is no on-line version or web site, which either makes John a dinosaur or a man of character. (I opt for the second, since the editorial team occasionally has a kind word for me.)”

John Howe — Canadian artist and co-conceptual designer on all three “The Lord of the Rings” motion pictures.

* Editor’s Note: The age of the dinosaurs has at last come to an end — with the arrival of this website!

The Imperative of Defeating Aggression in Ukraine

On January 20, 2023

© By John Arkelian

“Let it not be said that the dedication of those who love freedom is less than the determination of those who would destroy it.”  (Margaret Thatcher)

There are a myriad of compelling reasons why we must defend freedom and defeat aggression in Ukraine.  The moral imperative to act is that a fellow democracy is the victim of an unprovoked attack by a bigger neighbor.  Protecting freedom, democracy, and human rights is at the very heart of our core values.  Without those core

Copyright © 2022 by Michael de Adder

values, we are nothing.  If our professed allegiance to those values has any meaning, we must stand ready to fight to protect and preserve them — at home and abroad.

The humanitarian imperative to act is the responsibility to protect those who are in mortal peril from lawless violence and oppression.  And the violence being perpetrated by the Putin regime in Ukraine could not be more wanton, lawless, and cruel.  Civilians are being targeted, countless lives (of men, women, and children) have been lost, millions have been forced to flee their homes, entire cities have been destroyed, and the contrast between right and wrong could not be clearer.  This is one conflict that has no shades of grey, no moral ambiguity.  A ruthless autocrat and his own duped citizens have inflicted a murderous war of aggression on their neighbors and erstwhile kin.

The legal imperative to act is our obligation to defend and enforce the legal tenets to which we have sworn fealty.  Engaging in a war of aggression is a crime in international law; so, too, are war crimes (such as targeting civilians or acting with a reckless disregard for their safety), crimes against humanity, and genocide.  All of those crimes are on blatantly open display in Ukraine — with the systematic bombing, rape, torture, forced deportation to Russia, or outright murder of civilians.  We expect to be free from those outrages; we must ensure and enforce that same expectation for others.  Our commitment to justice and to the rule of law requires us to act when the most sacred of laws are being shamelessly contravened.  And, there is another legal imperative.  The United Nations was founded in 1945 in order to save mankind from the scourge of war:

We have sworn allegiance to those principles, and we have a consequent moral and legal obligation to uphold them.  Alas, the U.N. Security Council is hobbled in its ability to prevent wars of aggression by the presence among its permanent (veto-power wielding) members of two of the world’s worst bad actors — Russia and China.  The United Nations serves some useful purposes; but, it generally cannot fulfil its core mandate — to prevent wars of aggression — because two of the worst state-villains can (and do) block it from acting.  The Free World therefore needs to do what the U.N. cannot — by forcefully intervening to defeat aggressors and to thwart systemic human rights abuses around the world, using its might to defend the weak when others would oppress, enslave, or kill them.  Because Ukraine is not a member of NATO, there is no contractual (treaty) obligation for us to defend it, but, that matters not one whit in the face of the other compelling imperatives that impel us to do exactly that.

The geopolitical imperative to act ought to be crystal clear.  We learned at great cost, 90 years ago, that appeasing aggressors does not work.  The only effective response to aggression is to meet it head-on with force and to defeat it.  Failing to do so only emboldens the aggressor and invites more of the same.  The West failed to respond adequately (or sometimes at all) when Putin’s regime used lawless brute force within Russia itself (in Chechnya) and elsewhere (in Georgia, Moldova, Syria, and, in 2014, in Ukraine).  Our weak responses to those acts of aggression did nothing to disincentivize Putin from ‘upping the ante’ with a full-blown invasion of Ukraine in 2022.  Defeating aggression elsewhere is therefore not just a matter of altruism, it is also a compelling matter of our own vital self-interest.  As the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, has said, “The war of Russia is not only the war against Ukraine.  Russia is trying to defeat the freedom of all people in Europe, of all the people in the world.  It tries to show that only crude and cruel force matters.  It tries to show that people do not matter.  The world must stop the war.  I thank everyone who acts in support of Ukraine, in support of freedom.  But the war continues…”

Note:  Our in-depth analysis sets out the moral, humanitarian, legal, and geopolitical imperatives for us to act to defend freedom and defeat Putin’s aggression against Ukraine.  It considers what the West’s objectives should be and how much force is required to achieve them.  It makes the case for not blinking in the face of nuclear blackmail.  And it posits sixteen new rules of engagement designed to defeat and expel invading Russian forces from Ukraine.  See “The  Imperative of Defeating Aggression in Ukraine” at:  https://artsforum.ca/ideas/in-depth

 

 

Comments are closed.